- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: Community Contribution Statistics
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: Community Contribution Statistics
First, thank you Enric for your awesome work, and for sharing it
with us.
As member of the board, and in particular as part of the Governance WG, and picking on the bait for the discussion, I feel I can make a few comments on the above:
Thanks
Daniel
On 8/21/2025 8:52 PM, Enric Tobella
Alomar wrote:
A few highlights:
- Our top contributors come from a broad range of companies and individuals, which shows the diversity and strength of our ecosystem.
- At the same time, our delegates and board composition reflects historical patterns, with a large share coming from just a few companies.
This contrast suggests an opportunity: as our contributor base diversifies, our governance could also evolve to better reflect the variety of people and organizations who make this association possible.
As member of the board, and in particular as part of the Governance WG, and picking on the bait for the discussion, I feel I can make a few comments on the above:
- As a principle: I believe we all agree on embracing and accommodating for diversity on backgrounds, points of view, etc.
- Regarding Delegates: I honestly don't know how diverse or concentrated they are. But they're probably Males, European and Technical in background. We want better. There is a batch of new delegates every year. What can we do to promote more diversity?
- Regarding Board: the problem has been actually the opposite - some long time board members feel tired and and to not reapply, but we lack candidates. Renewal and "new blood" will surely be welcome. There a board election every year. What can we do to get more candidates to apply?
- Finally, a lot of this is governed by our bylaws. It there something that should be changed there?
Thanks
Daniel
--
DANIEL
REIS
MANAGING PARTNER
MANAGING PARTNER
>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M:
+351 919 991 307
E:
dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A:
Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517
Cascais
by Daniel Reis - 01:35 - 22 Aug 2025
Reference
-
Community Contribution Statistics
Dear members,
I’m happy to share that the contribution statistics have been restored and are now published again in a public repository: https://github.com/OCA-contributors/monthly-statistics/. Also, there is another repository where the code used to do it is shared: https://github.com/OCA-contributors/contributors-statistics-generator. This way, everyone can explore the data, verify it, and even improve the tooling if needed.
I plan to publish the monthly results at the begining of each month. It has not been published inside OCA because I opened the topic several times, but there were some issues for doing it. So, I’ve started publishing it independently so the whole community can benefit. I will not publish it under Dixmit banner in order to keep it neutral and independent.
The goal is to celebrate our contributors and provide transparency on how our community is evolving. A few highlights:
- Our top contributors come from a broad range of companies and individuals, which shows the diversity and strength of our ecosystem.
- At the same time, our delegates and board composition reflects historical patterns, with a large share coming from just a few companies.
This contrast suggests an opportunity: as our contributor base diversifies, our governance could also evolve to better reflect the variety of people and organizations who make this association possible.
I’d like to open the conversation on:
- How can we keep contribution statistics as a regular, neutral resource?
- How can governance and community contributions stay closely connected?
- What other forms of transparency would help us all feel engaged?
A big thank-you to everyone who contributes code, reviews and energy.
Sincerely,Enric Tobella AlomarCEO & Founder
by Enric Tobella Alomar - 09:51 - 21 Aug 2025