Skip to Content
  2. Mailing Lists
  3. Contributors
  4. Re: Community Contribution Statistics

Archives

Contributors

Re: Community Contribution Statistics

Re: Community Contribution Statistics

Re: Community Contribution Statistics

First, thank you Enric for your awesome work, and for sharing it with us.

On 8/21/2025 8:52 PM, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:
A few highlights:

- Our top contributors come from a broad range of companies and individuals, which shows the diversity and strength of our ecosystem.
- At the same time, our delegates and board composition reflects historical patterns, with a large share coming from just a few companies.

This contrast suggests an opportunity: as our contributor base diversifies, our governance could also evolve to better reflect the variety of people and organizations who make this association possible.

As member of the board, and in particular as part of the Governance WG, and picking on the bait for the discussion, I feel I can make a few comments on the above:
  • As a principle: I believe we all agree on embracing and accommodating for diversity on backgrounds, points of view, etc.
  • Regarding Delegates: I honestly don't know how diverse or concentrated they are. But they're probably Males, European and Technical in background. We want better. There is a batch of new delegates every year. What can we do to promote more diversity?
  • Regarding Board: the problem has been actually the opposite - some long time board members feel tired and and to not reapply, but we lack candidates. Renewal and "new blood" will surely be welcome. There a board election every year. What can we do to get more candidates to apply?
  • Finally, a lot of this is governed by our bylaws. It there something that should be changed there?

Thanks
Daniel


--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER

>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais

[Logo OpenSourceIntegrators.com]


by Daniel Reis - 01:35 - 22 Aug 2025

Reference

  • Community Contribution Statistics
    Dear members,

    I’m happy to share that the contribution statistics have been restored and are now published again in a public repository: https://github.com/OCA-contributors/monthly-statistics/. Also, there is another repository where the code used to do it is shared: https://github.com/OCA-contributors/contributors-statistics-generator. This way, everyone can explore the data, verify it, and even improve the tooling if needed.

    I plan to publish the monthly results at the begining of each month. It has not been published inside OCA because I opened the topic several times, but there were some issues for doing it. So, I’ve started publishing it independently so the whole community can benefit. I will not publish it under Dixmit banner in order to keep it neutral and independent.

    The goal is to celebrate our contributors and provide transparency on how our community is evolving. A few highlights:

    - Our top contributors come from a broad range of companies and individuals, which shows the diversity and strength of our ecosystem.
    - At the same time, our delegates and board composition reflects historical patterns, with a large share coming from just a few companies.

    This contrast suggests an opportunity: as our contributor base diversifies, our governance could also evolve to better reflect the variety of people and organizations who make this association possible.

    I’d like to open the conversation on:

    - How can we keep contribution statistics as a regular, neutral resource?
    - How can governance and community contributions stay closely connected?
    - What other forms of transparency would help us all feel engaged?

    A big thank-you to everyone who contributes code, reviews and energy.

    Sincerely,

    Enric Tobella Alomar
    CEO & Founder

    by Enric Tobella Alomar - 09:51 - 21 Aug 2025

    21 replies 21 replies

    • Re: Community Contribution Statistics

      Thank you! Thanks to all in this thread for their clear thoughts as well.

      PS. and Raphael for the link to Yoshi's article! Loved it, very recognizable

      On 9/13/25 00:33, Frederik Kramer wrote:

      Thanks Tom,

      and i really hope you will run again. Your fresh, yet clean thoughts already helped a lot during the last year.

      Best Frederik

      Am 13.09.25 um 00:12 schrieb Tom Blauwendraat:
      If I may also share something from the perspective of a "new" board member who spent now a year.

      We started out this year with a feeling of urgency to make changes, and some good plans.

      But, it seemed to me like the whole idea of the "Board" was conceived in a time where it was that Board who not only decided, but also executed those things that were deemed necessary to do. Whereas the rest of OCA basically did however they pleased in the anarchy (or, if you will, PSC-herded meritocracy) of Github.

      Now, we are in a time where the OCA is facing complex problems and big tasks.

      For complex problems, finding first consensus between 8 people with each their opinions and limited time to discuss, is already difficult, let alone that it's then necessary to get all the stakeholders on board also, for which the only official arenas are this monstrosity of a mailing list and the yearly event.

      For big tasks, executors are needed, and there the tools currently are: RFQ's, some paid employees, volunteer workgroups, and enthusiastic individuals.

      I don't think the solution is to be found in having new or more board members - I think the current board members should be wise enough, but:

      1. They should not be the ones that make the big decisions, and neither should this mailinglist be - we need to make better use of the AGA or of delegate meetings, in order to make the tough calls with all stakeholders present. Then the Board has a clear mandate and mission.

      2. They should be surrounded by enough people that can execute things, because the wiser they are (and you want Wise Men in your board), the less time they will have

      3. They should not be such a large group. If you have less people, but each with a bit more time and energy available to respond quickly to pressing issues, it is easier to act.

      So I think it's not about finding new Board members per se, although having like 2 new people with new energy is obviously nice; I think it's rather about having a lean, dedicated Board, a good decisionmaking structure, and all other work coordinated via workgroups and PSC teams.

      In which case I'll personally also gladly step away from the Board, because I can make myself useful in the WG teams that I like, the PSC teams of the modules I like, and I can give my opinion and vote in an assembly, to proposals prepared partly by the Board and partly by stakeholding members themselves.

      The above is just my observation/opinion. But I thought I'd share because it's distinctly different from "We need new Board members". If I am going to try and enthusiate people at the OCA days to become a volunteer, I'd rather try to get them to join a WG.

      -Tom












      12 sep. 2025 23:02:48 Enric Tobella Alomar <notifications@odoo-community.org>:

      Hi,

      Thanks a lot for sharing. I fully understand what you mean. I have been in the board and it is not easy. We both know that. It is quite easy to complain from the other side on the work done by the board, but we can be clear on one thing, you are doing a great job there and you all try to keep the OCA running. The same happens from the contributors, but from another perspective.

      I also agree that the key is to ensure renewal by motivating more people to step forward. There have been years with several candidates and years with a small set of new possible board members, however. It is not easy to find people interested on the job.

      For me, the point was never to accuse anyone of holding on to a seat (and I’m sorry if I gave you that impression). What matters is that we create space for fresh perspectives while also valuing the commitment of experienced members. Both are essential for a healthy balance. It is hard to find it, but we should do it for the sake of the OCA.

      Best regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 21:47, Frederik Kramer (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:

      Hi Enric,

      I honestly think that people running for the board of the OCA really want to devote a good junk of their time "to make Odoo mightier together" and help us all to succeed what we belive is our joint dreams instead of taking and keeping prestigous role just because. 

      Unfortunately many context factors don't render that pursue (i.e. being impactful AND successful on the Board) easy. If we have enough volontueers this year running and forming a new board, maybe you include again, with a really tough agenda and problems already on the line or insight (among as trivial stuff as financially sustain the OCA), i am happy to devote my OCA time from a back seat and let others do this job, not being indirectly accused for taking one of the precious seats again. 

      At least i would not have to take care anymore about things i DO NOT love nearly as much as contributing real community value to an overall healthy and motivated community (that was my initial motivation to run for the board).

      The reality is, most of the work on the board has not been too much fun (especially lately) and am happy to hand things over to new people. Remember i personally tried to convince 5-6 newbies for the board last year out of which 1 (namely Ivan) was running and has been elected. Ivan did a great job and was a great value to the team so far. Same was Tom. So in order to move things into that direction we may organize a little on stage "running for the board" campaign next week in which volunteers can present themselfes and their agendas to the members around. What do you think ?

      Best Frederik


      Am 12.09.25 um 18:57 schrieb Enric Tobella Alomar:
      Hi Tom, 

      Sadly, I am unable to come this year for some personal reasons. I am sure that we can make an online meeting if you are interested.

      Regarding the board, this has been a recurring topic in the community. What strikes me as odd is that while renewal is regularly encouraged, most former board members still run for re-election. In some cases, even when there were enough new candidates to fill the seats, the former members were all re-elected.

      If we don’t intentionally make space for new candidates, it will be difficult to bring in fresh perspectives. I don’t have a definitive solution, but I believe it’s worth reflecting on how we can better encourage and support renewal.

      I know that there is some new faces on the board (like you this year). I hope this trend continues.

      Kind regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 16:52, Tom Blauwendraat (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió: 
      On 8/22/25 15:32, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:



> On the Board, I share your concern. At my first OCA Days (2018 or 



> 2019), the Board asked for proposals to completely renew itself. Since 



> then, few members have stepped aside, but some remain there. Maybe, at 



> some point, stepping aside could help bring new perspectives.
What we have tried to do here in the past year is to form Workgroups, 
with the goal of diverting the actual work there. Nobody wants to be a 
Board member, but there are a lot more people who want to contribute to 
a small part that they feel enthousiastic about. This idea could be 
built upon.



> Personally, I would like to see a mandate limit on the Board, PSC 



> formal election definition and a clear reflection of how each role is 



> decided, but it is my personal opinion.

Will you be at the OCA days to join discussions on how to come from 
opinions to actual proposals that can be implemented?

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Tom Blauwendraat - 11:45 - 13 Sep 2025
    • Re: Community Contribution Statistics

      Thanks Tom,

      and i really hope you will run again. Your fresh, yet clean thoughts already helped a lot during the last year.

      Best Frederik

      Am 13.09.25 um 00:12 schrieb Tom Blauwendraat:
      If I may also share something from the perspective of a "new" board member who spent now a year.

      We started out this year with a feeling of urgency to make changes, and some good plans.

      But, it seemed to me like the whole idea of the "Board" was conceived in a time where it was that Board who not only decided, but also executed those things that were deemed necessary to do. Whereas the rest of OCA basically did however they pleased in the anarchy (or, if you will, PSC-herded meritocracy) of Github.

      Now, we are in a time where the OCA is facing complex problems and big tasks.

      For complex problems, finding first consensus between 8 people with each their opinions and limited time to discuss, is already difficult, let alone that it's then necessary to get all the stakeholders on board also, for which the only official arenas are this monstrosity of a mailing list and the yearly event.

      For big tasks, executors are needed, and there the tools currently are: RFQ's, some paid employees, volunteer workgroups, and enthusiastic individuals.

      I don't think the solution is to be found in having new or more board members - I think the current board members should be wise enough, but:

      1. They should not be the ones that make the big decisions, and neither should this mailinglist be - we need to make better use of the AGA or of delegate meetings, in order to make the tough calls with all stakeholders present. Then the Board has a clear mandate and mission.

      2. They should be surrounded by enough people that can execute things, because the wiser they are (and you want Wise Men in your board), the less time they will have

      3. They should not be such a large group. If you have less people, but each with a bit more time and energy available to respond quickly to pressing issues, it is easier to act.

      So I think it's not about finding new Board members per se, although having like 2 new people with new energy is obviously nice; I think it's rather about having a lean, dedicated Board, a good decisionmaking structure, and all other work coordinated via workgroups and PSC teams.

      In which case I'll personally also gladly step away from the Board, because I can make myself useful in the WG teams that I like, the PSC teams of the modules I like, and I can give my opinion and vote in an assembly, to proposals prepared partly by the Board and partly by stakeholding members themselves.

      The above is just my observation/opinion. But I thought I'd share because it's distinctly different from "We need new Board members". If I am going to try and enthusiate people at the OCA days to become a volunteer, I'd rather try to get them to join a WG.

      -Tom












      12 sep. 2025 23:02:48 Enric Tobella Alomar <notifications@odoo-community.org>:

      Hi,

      Thanks a lot for sharing. I fully understand what you mean. I have been in the board and it is not easy. We both know that. It is quite easy to complain from the other side on the work done by the board, but we can be clear on one thing, you are doing a great job there and you all try to keep the OCA running. The same happens from the contributors, but from another perspective.

      I also agree that the key is to ensure renewal by motivating more people to step forward. There have been years with several candidates and years with a small set of new possible board members, however. It is not easy to find people interested on the job.

      For me, the point was never to accuse anyone of holding on to a seat (and I’m sorry if I gave you that impression). What matters is that we create space for fresh perspectives while also valuing the commitment of experienced members. Both are essential for a healthy balance. It is hard to find it, but we should do it for the sake of the OCA.

      Best regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 21:47, Frederik Kramer (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:

      Hi Enric,

      I honestly think that people running for the board of the OCA really want to devote a good junk of their time "to make Odoo mightier together" and help us all to succeed what we belive is our joint dreams instead of taking and keeping prestigous role just because. 

      Unfortunately many context factors don't render that pursue (i.e. being impactful AND successful on the Board) easy. If we have enough volontueers this year running and forming a new board, maybe you include again, with a really tough agenda and problems already on the line or insight (among as trivial stuff as financially sustain the OCA), i am happy to devote my OCA time from a back seat and let others do this job, not being indirectly accused for taking one of the precious seats again. 

      At least i would not have to take care anymore about things i DO NOT love nearly as much as contributing real community value to an overall healthy and motivated community (that was my initial motivation to run for the board).

      The reality is, most of the work on the board has not been too much fun (especially lately) and am happy to hand things over to new people. Remember i personally tried to convince 5-6 newbies for the board last year out of which 1 (namely Ivan) was running and has been elected. Ivan did a great job and was a great value to the team so far. Same was Tom. So in order to move things into that direction we may organize a little on stage "running for the board" campaign next week in which volunteers can present themselfes and their agendas to the members around. What do you think ?

      Best Frederik


      Am 12.09.25 um 18:57 schrieb Enric Tobella Alomar:
      Hi Tom, 

      Sadly, I am unable to come this year for some personal reasons. I am sure that we can make an online meeting if you are interested.

      Regarding the board, this has been a recurring topic in the community. What strikes me as odd is that while renewal is regularly encouraged, most former board members still run for re-election. In some cases, even when there were enough new candidates to fill the seats, the former members were all re-elected.

      If we don’t intentionally make space for new candidates, it will be difficult to bring in fresh perspectives. I don’t have a definitive solution, but I believe it’s worth reflecting on how we can better encourage and support renewal.

      I know that there is some new faces on the board (like you this year). I hope this trend continues.

      Kind regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 16:52, Tom Blauwendraat (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió: 
      On 8/22/25 15:32, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:



> On the Board, I share your concern. At my first OCA Days (2018 or 



> 2019), the Board asked for proposals to completely renew itself. Since 



> then, few members have stepped aside, but some remain there. Maybe, at 



> some point, stepping aside could help bring new perspectives.
What we have tried to do here in the past year is to form Workgroups, 
with the goal of diverting the actual work there. Nobody wants to be a 
Board member, but there are a lot more people who want to contribute to 
a small part that they feel enthousiastic about. This idea could be 
built upon.



> Personally, I would like to see a mandate limit on the Board, PSC 



> formal election definition and a clear reflection of how each role is 



> decided, but it is my personal opinion.

Will you be at the OCA days to join discussions on how to come from 
opinions to actual proposals that can be implemented?

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
      by Frederik Kramer - 12:31 - 13 Sep 2025
    • Re: Community Contribution Statistics
      If I may also share something from the perspective of a "new" board member who spent now a year.

      We started out this year with a feeling of urgency to make changes, and some good plans.

      But, it seemed to me like the whole idea of the "Board" was conceived in a time where it was that Board who not only decided, but also executed those things that were deemed necessary to do. Whereas the rest of OCA basically did however they pleased in the anarchy (or, if you will, PSC-herded meritocracy) of Github.

      Now, we are in a time where the OCA is facing complex problems and big tasks.

      For complex problems, finding first consensus between 8 people with each their opinions and limited time to discuss, is already difficult, let alone that it's then necessary to get all the stakeholders on board also, for which the only official arenas are this monstrosity of a mailing list and the yearly event.

      For big tasks, executors are needed, and there the tools currently are: RFQ's, some paid employees, volunteer workgroups, and enthusiastic individuals.

      I don't think the solution is to be found in having new or more board members - I think the current board members should be wise enough, but:

      1. They should not be the ones that make the big decisions, and neither should this mailinglist be - we need to make better use of the AGA or of delegate meetings, in order to make the tough calls with all stakeholders present. Then the Board has a clear mandate and mission.

      2. They should be surrounded by enough people that can execute things, because the wiser they are (and you want Wise Men in your board), the less time they will have

      3. They should not be such a large group. If you have less people, but each with a bit more time and energy available to respond quickly to pressing issues, it is easier to act.

      So I think it's not about finding new Board members per se, although having like 2 new people with new energy is obviously nice; I think it's rather about having a lean, dedicated Board, a good decisionmaking structure, and all other work coordinated via workgroups and PSC teams.

      In which case I'll personally also gladly step away from the Board, because I can make myself useful in the WG teams that I like, the PSC teams of the modules I like, and I can give my opinion and vote in an assembly, to proposals prepared partly by the Board and partly by stakeholding members themselves.

      The above is just my observation/opinion. But I thought I'd share because it's distinctly different from "We need new Board members". If I am going to try and enthusiate people at the OCA days to become a volunteer, I'd rather try to get them to join a WG.

      -Tom












      12 sep. 2025 23:02:48 Enric Tobella Alomar <notifications@odoo-community.org>:

      Hi,

      Thanks a lot for sharing. I fully understand what you mean. I have been in the board and it is not easy. We both know that. It is quite easy to complain from the other side on the work done by the board, but we can be clear on one thing, you are doing a great job there and you all try to keep the OCA running. The same happens from the contributors, but from another perspective.

      I also agree that the key is to ensure renewal by motivating more people to step forward. There have been years with several candidates and years with a small set of new possible board members, however. It is not easy to find people interested on the job.

      For me, the point was never to accuse anyone of holding on to a seat (and I’m sorry if I gave you that impression). What matters is that we create space for fresh perspectives while also valuing the commitment of experienced members. Both are essential for a healthy balance. It is hard to find it, but we should do it for the sake of the OCA.

      Best regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 21:47, Frederik Kramer (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:

      Hi Enric,

      I honestly think that people running for the board of the OCA really want to devote a good junk of their time "to make Odoo mightier together" and help us all to succeed what we belive is our joint dreams instead of taking and keeping prestigous role just because. 

      Unfortunately many context factors don't render that pursue (i.e. being impactful AND successful on the Board) easy. If we have enough volontueers this year running and forming a new board, maybe you include again, with a really tough agenda and problems already on the line or insight (among as trivial stuff as financially sustain the OCA), i am happy to devote my OCA time from a back seat and let others do this job, not being indirectly accused for taking one of the precious seats again. 

      At least i would not have to take care anymore about things i DO NOT love nearly as much as contributing real community value to an overall healthy and motivated community (that was my initial motivation to run for the board).

      The reality is, most of the work on the board has not been too much fun (especially lately) and am happy to hand things over to new people. Remember i personally tried to convince 5-6 newbies for the board last year out of which 1 (namely Ivan) was running and has been elected. Ivan did a great job and was a great value to the team so far. Same was Tom. So in order to move things into that direction we may organize a little on stage "running for the board" campaign next week in which volunteers can present themselfes and their agendas to the members around. What do you think ?

      Best Frederik


      Am 12.09.25 um 18:57 schrieb Enric Tobella Alomar:
      Hi Tom, 

      Sadly, I am unable to come this year for some personal reasons. I am sure that we can make an online meeting if you are interested.

      Regarding the board, this has been a recurring topic in the community. What strikes me as odd is that while renewal is regularly encouraged, most former board members still run for re-election. In some cases, even when there were enough new candidates to fill the seats, the former members were all re-elected.

      If we don’t intentionally make space for new candidates, it will be difficult to bring in fresh perspectives. I don’t have a definitive solution, but I believe it’s worth reflecting on how we can better encourage and support renewal.

      I know that there is some new faces on the board (like you this year). I hope this trend continues.

      Kind regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 16:52, Tom Blauwendraat (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió: 
      On 8/22/25 15:32, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:



> On the Board, I share your concern. At my first OCA Days (2018 or 



> 2019), the Board asked for proposals to completely renew itself. Since 



> then, few members have stepped aside, but some remain there. Maybe, at 



> some point, stepping aside could help bring new perspectives.
What we have tried to do here in the past year is to form Workgroups, 
with the goal of diverting the actual work there. Nobody wants to be a 
Board member, but there are a lot more people who want to contribute to 
a small part that they feel enthousiastic about. This idea could be 
built upon.



> Personally, I would like to see a mandate limit on the Board, PSC 



> formal election definition and a clear reflection of how each role is 



> decided, but it is my personal opinion.

Will you be at the OCA days to join discussions on how to come from 
opinions to actual proposals that can be implemented?

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Tom Blauwendraat - 12:11 - 13 Sep 2025
    • Re: Community Contribution Statistics
      Hi,

      Thanks a lot for sharing. I fully understand what you mean. I have been in the board and it is not easy. We both know that. It is quite easy to complain from the other side on the work done by the board, but we can be clear on one thing, you are doing a great job there and you all try to keep the OCA running. The same happens from the contributors, but from another perspective.

      I also agree that the key is to ensure renewal by motivating more people to step forward. There have been years with several candidates and years with a small set of new possible board members, however. It is not easy to find people interested on the job.

      For me, the point was never to accuse anyone of holding on to a seat (and I’m sorry if I gave you that impression). What matters is that we create space for fresh perspectives while also valuing the commitment of experienced members. Both are essential for a healthy balance. It is hard to find it, but we should do it for the sake of the OCA.

      Best regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 21:47, Frederik Kramer (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:

      Hi Enric,

      I honestly think that people running for the board of the OCA really want to devote a good junk of their time "to make Odoo mightier together" and help us all to succeed what we belive is our joint dreams instead of taking and keeping prestigous role just because. 

      Unfortunately many context factors don't render that pursue (i.e. being impactful AND successful on the Board) easy. If we have enough volontueers this year running and forming a new board, maybe you include again, with a really tough agenda and problems already on the line or insight (among as trivial stuff as financially sustain the OCA), i am happy to devote my OCA time from a back seat and let others do this job, not being indirectly accused for taking one of the precious seats again. 

      At least i would not have to take care anymore about things i DO NOT love nearly as much as contributing real community value to an overall healthy and motivated community (that was my initial motivation to run for the board).

      The reality is, most of the work on the board has not been too much fun (especially lately) and am happy to hand things over to new people. Remember i personally tried to convince 5-6 newbies for the board last year out of which 1 (namely Ivan) was running and has been elected. Ivan did a great job and was a great value to the team so far. Same was Tom. So in order to move things into that direction we may organize a little on stage "running for the board" campaign next week in which volunteers can present themselfes and their agendas to the members around. What do you think ?

      Best Frederik


      Am 12.09.25 um 18:57 schrieb Enric Tobella Alomar:
      Hi Tom, 

      Sadly, I am unable to come this year for some personal reasons. I am sure that we can make an online meeting if you are interested.

      Regarding the board, this has been a recurring topic in the community. What strikes me as odd is that while renewal is regularly encouraged, most former board members still run for re-election. In some cases, even when there were enough new candidates to fill the seats, the former members were all re-elected.

      If we don’t intentionally make space for new candidates, it will be difficult to bring in fresh perspectives. I don’t have a definitive solution, but I believe it’s worth reflecting on how we can better encourage and support renewal.

      I know that there is some new faces on the board (like you this year). I hope this trend continues.

      Kind regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 16:52, Tom Blauwendraat (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:
      On 8/22/25 15:32, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:



> On the Board, I share your concern. At my first OCA Days (2018 or 



> 2019), the Board asked for proposals to completely renew itself. Since 



> then, few members have stepped aside, but some remain there. Maybe, at 



> some point, stepping aside could help bring new perspectives.
What we have tried to do here in the past year is to form Workgroups, 
with the goal of diverting the actual work there. Nobody wants to be a 
Board member, but there are a lot more people who want to contribute to 
a small part that they feel enthousiastic about. This idea could be 
built upon.



> Personally, I would like to see a mandate limit on the Board, PSC 



> formal election definition and a clear reflection of how each role is 



> decided, but it is my personal opinion.

Will you be at the OCA days to join discussions on how to come from 
opinions to actual proposals that can be implemented?

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      by Enric Tobella Alomar - 11:01 - 12 Sep 2025
    • Re: Community Contribution Statistics

      Hi Enric,

      I honestly think that people running for the board of the OCA really want to devote a good junk of their time "to make Odoo mightier together" and help us all to succeed what we belive is our joint dreams instead of taking and keeping prestigous role just because. 

      Unfortunately many context factors don't render that pursue (i.e. being impactful AND successful on the Board) easy. If we have enough volontueers this year running and forming a new board, maybe you include again, with a really tough agenda and problems already on the line or insight (among as trivial stuff as financially sustain the OCA), i am happy to devote my OCA time from a back seat and let others do this job, not being indirectly accused for taking one of the precious seats again. 

      At least i would not have to take care anymore about things i DO NOT love nearly as much as contributing real community value to an overall healthy and motivated community (that was my initial motivation to run for the board).

      The reality is, most of the work on the board has not been too much fun (especially lately) and am happy to hand things over to new people. Remember i personally tried to convince 5-6 newbies for the board last year out of which 1 (namely Ivan) was running and has been elected. Ivan did a great job and was a great value to the team so far. Same was Tom. So in order to move things into that direction we may organize a little on stage "running for the board" campaign next week in which volunteers can present themselfes and their agendas to the members around. What do you think ?

      Best Frederik


      Am 12.09.25 um 18:57 schrieb Enric Tobella Alomar:
      Hi Tom, 

      Sadly, I am unable to come this year for some personal reasons. I am sure that we can make an online meeting if you are interested.

      Regarding the board, this has been a recurring topic in the community. What strikes me as odd is that while renewal is regularly encouraged, most former board members still run for re-election. In some cases, even when there were enough new candidates to fill the seats, the former members were all re-elected.

      If we don’t intentionally make space for new candidates, it will be difficult to bring in fresh perspectives. I don’t have a definitive solution, but I believe it’s worth reflecting on how we can better encourage and support renewal.

      I know that there is some new faces on the board (like you this year). I hope this trend continues.

      Kind regards,

      El vie, 12 sept 2025 a las 16:52, Tom Blauwendraat (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:
      On 8/22/25 15:32, Enric Tobella Alomar wrote:


> On the Board, I share your concern. At my first OCA Days (2018 or 


> 2019), the Board asked for proposals to completely renew itself. Since 


> then, few members have stepped aside, but some remain there. Maybe, at 


> some point, stepping aside could help bring new perspectives.
What we have tried to do here in the past year is to form Workgroups, 
with the goal of diverting the actual work there. Nobody wants to be a 
Board member, but there are a lot more people who want to contribute to 
a small part that they feel enthousiastic about. This idea could be 
built upon.


> Personally, I would like to see a mandate limit on the Board, PSC 


> formal election definition and a clear reflection of how each role is 


> decided, but it is my personal opinion.

Will you be at the OCA days to join discussions on how to come from 
opinions to actual proposals that can be implemented?

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



      --
      Enric Tobella Alomar
      CEO & Founder

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      -- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer

initOS GmbH
Innungsstraße 7
21244 Buchholz i.d.N.

Tel:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 12
Fax:   +49 (0) 4181 13503 10
Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819

Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Internet: www.initos.com

Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N.
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
      by Frederik Kramer - 09:46 - 12 Sep 2025