- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: Company as maintainer
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: Company as maintainer
by Pedro M. Baeza - 11:55 - 29 Oct 2022
Reference
-
Company as maintainer
Hello,since we have several devs working on modules developed by our company in OCA, we'd like to attribute the role of "maintainer" of such modules to a company github account in order to centralize:- notifications about changes to modules we have originally developed- questions and communications about the aforementioned modules- merging of minor changes such as this oneWould it be possible for us to do so?Thanks for your opinion!--Francesco ForestiSicurpharma Srl
by Francesco Foresti - 04:20 - 27 Oct 2022-
Re: Company as maintainer
Hi, I think there are several interesting points in this conversation, as well as Jean-Charles' project which could be very useful in my opinion - keeping track of specific modules' improvement and/or bug reports would make our work quite easier.For example, knowing if a certain behavior has been fixed in a commit for the previous or next version of a module, and just migrating the commit instead of fixing it again.In general, as I mentioned in a previous email, I think it would be extremely convenient for PMs and devs alike to have some space where all things related to a module could be collected - PRs, known issues, general discussions, if module is or will be discontinued in future versions and why...But to keep discussion focus on maintainership:Let's say Company A contracts Dev X to develop Module 1Module 1 is built on specifications provided by Company A, to address use cases from customers of Company A, and ultimately it's PM from Company A who designs how the module should work functionally (of course based on technical expertise and guidance from Dev X)If Dev X stops working with Company A, takes a sabbatical, leaves odoo development altogether or simply does not check notifications on email related to github account...Are we sure that maintainership is better ensured by assigning the "maintainer" role to Dev X rather than Company A?Ultimately I don't think it's a bad idea to have them both.FrancescoIl giorno dom 30 ott 2022 alle ore 01:37 Jean-Charles Drubay <notifications@odoo-community.org> ha scritto:Hi,I share the same observation more and more: there is a need to track/manage modules instead of repositories.Going in this direction I started to work on this topic which started around OpenUpgrade only at first until I realized that this need was broader than OpenUpgrade only:I have prepared a prototype to share the information per module and which can be tested here https://oca-cm-15.komit.linkThe Issues and PRs are linked to the module base d on the name of the Issues/PRs so at this stage it's not reliable.But naming conventions could be enforced by github checks I guess, at least for the PRs.Adding a notification mechanism should not be complicated.I am currently working on a v2 of the prototype.I am open to sharing the code, which I already did upon request.I am also open to discussions.Best regards,
Jean-CharlesOn Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 4:57 PM Pedro M. Baeza <notifications@odoo-community.or g> wrote:I'm afraid I don't have a solution for that. I'm subscribed to everything... and yes, lots of noise. But it also serves for having a whole picture, as "what are the modules I am interested in?" Maybe a new module arises over a feature I want.I use my self-called "5 seconds rule" for dealing with the huge amount of notifications: 5 seconds to decide if to discard it, answer immediately if it takes less than a minute, which can be my distraction window, or let it in my inbox for a later and more calm answer. This allows me to be reactive enough as well as not requiring too much time.Regards._______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
--Francesco ForestiSicurpharma Srl+39 333 8123 790
by Francesco Foresti - 02:46 - 31 Oct 2022 -
Re: Company as maintainer
Hi,I share the same observation more and more: there is a need to track/manage modules instead of repositories.Going in this direction I started to work on this topic which started around OpenUpgrade only at first until I realized that this need was broader than OpenUpgrade only:I have prepared a prototype to share the information per module and which can be tested here https://oca-cm-15.komit.linkThe Issues and PRs are linked to the module based on the name of the Issues/PRs so at this stage it's not reliable.But naming conventions could be enforced by github checks I guess, at least for the PRs.Adding a notification mechanism should not be complicated.I am currently working on a v2 of the prototype.I am open to sharing the code, which I already did upon request.I am also open to discussions.Best regards,
Jean-CharlesOn Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 4:57 PM Pedro M. Baeza <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:I'm afraid I don't have a solution for that. I'm subscribed to everything... and yes, lots of noise. But it also serves for having a whole picture, as "what are the modules I am interested in?" Maybe a new module arises over a feature I want.I use my self-called "5 seconds rule" for dealing with the huge amount of notifications: 5 seconds to decide if to discard it, answer immediately if it takes less than a minute, which can be my distraction window, or let it in my inbox for a later and more calm answer. This allows me to be reactive enough as well as not requiring too much time.Regards._______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Jean-Charles Drubay - 01:35 - 30 Oct 2022 -
Re: Company as maintainer
I'm afraid I don't have a solution for that. I'm subscribed to everything... and yes, lots of noise. But it also serves for having a whole picture, as "what are the modules I am interested in?" Maybe a new module arises over a feature I want.I use my self-called "5 seconds rule" for dealing with the huge amount of notifications: 5 seconds to decide if to discard it, answer immediately if it takes less than a minute, which can be my distraction window, or let it in my inbox for a later and more calm answer. This allows me to be reactive enough as well as not requiring too much time.Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 11:55 - 29 Oct 2022 -
Re: Company as maintainer
That's nice to know all the pull requests from your company.But what I'm after is a mechanism to be notified when there are pull requests or issues opened against modules I'm interested in.GitHub per repo notifications are too coarse, that generate too much noise for many modules I don't care about.-sbiOn Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:36 AM Pedro M. Baeza <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:What we do is to include in the pull request main comment `@Tecnativa` for later search for such pull requests, using `involves`. This is for example our current status:Regards._______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Stéphane Bidoul - 11:45 - 29 Oct 2022 -
Re: Company as maintainer
What we do is to include in the pull request main comment `@Tecnativa` for later search for such pull requests, using `involves`. This is for example our current status:Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 11:26 - 29 Oct 2022
-