- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update (case using Job Queue)
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update (case using Job Queue)
Re: ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update (case using Job Queue)
Re: ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update (case using Job Queue)
On 3/4/24 15:07, Kitti Upariphutthiphong wrote: > > I was thinking if there are anyway to unlock the table at least > temporarily during execution. But as far as I researching, I still > can't find the way. I don't think "temporary unlock" is possible, or advisable, but another way is to lock the table as late as possible, so, closest before commit() of your transaction. That way, the time that your lock persists is smallest and the chance for conflict is lowest (the lower you get it, the more viable it will be to just rely on RetryableJobError for the small amount of cases where a conflict arises). A strategy for this can be to do the thing that locks, and right after that, fire a new queue job that will do the rest of the stuff. We've had success with this in cases whereby you have for example: Process payment transaction job: 1. Start database transaction 2. Create payment transaction 3. Confirm sale.order, which may generate a stock.picking and confirm it, thereby locking quant table 4. Generate invoice (during this time some rows in quant table will still be locked, conflicts can occur) 5. Send out invoice by mail (during this time some rows in quant table will still be locked, conflicts can occur) 6. End of database transaction (commit) Instead, you will add "with_delay()" around steps 4+5 so that these are run in a separate queue job, for which the locking does not apply. Of course this requires refactoring of core or custom code so it might not be a viable solution in your case.
by Tom Blauwendraat - 03:26 - 4 Mar 2024
Reference
-
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update (case using Job Queue)
Dear community,We have a case that needs to process a lot of transactions (500k arrive on the last day of month). And so we rely on our best friend OCA's Job Queue and have things run in parallel.Most process are OK, but the one creates stock picking, jobs can't run in parallel because there is a concurrent issue on the "stock_quant" table, which looks like many separated job is updating the same record.bad query: update stock_quant set reserved_quantity = 10.00 ... where id in (100)ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent updatebad query: update stock_quant set reserved_quantity = 10.00 ... where id in (100)ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update.....Concurrent updates are very common issues we always face. How do you get around with this problem?Thank you,Kitti U.
by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 02:16 - 4 Mar 2024