- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
On 9/12/25 14:22, Daniel Reis wrote: > Let's recognize that at Odoo, the EE is what funds the R&D put into > the CE. > And even within the OCA, there is A LOT of code there that is funded > by EE customers. Question to all - I did not have the time, but did anyone already study Enric's statistics and manage to get some very rough estimate on which percentage of contributions come from "CE partners" and how many from "EE partners"? It's probably not possible to drill this down into perfect detail, but at the last OCA days I got a good idea by asking around which integrator has which kind of clients (Tecnative - all CE, Forgeflow - mixed, ACSONE - mostly EE, Camptocamp - mostly EE, ....) > The dual-licensing idea also seems promising to me, so I would like to > hear more opinions about it, if this is something the community agrees > can be a good idea. +1 to Sylvain and this idea. What I see is that there seems to be a "Team fully AGPL to defend open source values" and a "Team pragmatically LGPL + CE + EE", and unless there is a third option, the two can't agree. Last year I did a controversial talk on proprietary licensing in OCA, and in preparation for that I came across the Dual licensing idea. IMO it could be a genius solution because if you dual-license modules between AGPL and some "other" proprietary license, what you get is: - Anyone in the AGPL ecosystem can use the modules AGPL and be incentivised to AGPL-back any improvements, and not bother with licenses. - Anyone that pays the "other" license, -can- safely use the modules inside of an EE instance with no limitations, or build proprietary products on top; is ALSO incentivised to contribute back to the base modules that the AGPL camp uses; *and* in contrast with the situation when the modules would have been LGPL, OCA actually sees revenue from people doing that, which could go into: OpenUpgrade, laywer costs, paid employees that do license-policing, new AGPL developments, contributors..... you name it. Done smartly, it could even accelerate development of an AGPL alternative to EE. The talk stirred up a lot of fuss though because 1) some very staunchly open source contributors did not view the above as "free software" and threatened to leave the OCA if it came to that, and 2) the trouble is in the "you name it" part - who decides where the revenues go to? After facing heat over the above I dropped the idea, because that's what it was, just an idea - but here we are - if the alternative is that the OCA would split in two, maybe creative solutions are worth another discussion. -Tom
by Tom Blauwendraat - 02:55 - 12 Sep 2025
Reference
-
Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Hi,After years of only working on Odoo community, we are starting to have several enterprise clients.The OCA website at https://odoo-community.org/resources/faq indicates:Can I run OCA AGPL modules and closed source modules on the same instance?
Yes, as long as closed source modules do not depend on AGPL ones and respect the license of its dependencies defined in the “depends” key of its manifest file (and vice versa).
Odoo SA, indicated in 2015 https://www.odoo.com/fr_FR/blog/actualites-dodoo-5/adapting-our-open-source-license-245Will we be able to use AGPL modules and paid ones?
Odoo projects will be able to use AGPL modules or paid modules under proprietary licenses, but it is not possible to combine both. Combining LGLPv3 modules and proprietary modules is fine however, so we encourage current owners licensing under AGPL to move to LGPLv3 too, in order to avoid complications for end users.My CEO believes that this using both AGPL and proprietary modules, even if they do not have dependencies, is not allowed by the AGPL license.I’ve searched a bit on the mailing list (that started in 2015) but I have not found no discussion on the subject.On what basis does the OCA position comes from?Regards,--
Vincent Hatakeyama Directeur du pôle développement " Orbeet
+33 1 83 62 72 88
vincent.hatakeyama@orbeet.io
27, boulevard Saint-Martin
75003 Paris
https://orbeet.io
by "Vincent Hatakeyama" <vincent.hatakeyama@orbeet.io> - 10:36 - 8 Sep 2025