- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Hello,
Since everybody is giving its opinion, here is mine.
I think the license the contributor decides to put in the modules he is contributing to the OCA is his choice and should not be judged. We are a community, not a team or company. We don't necessarily share the same objectives and we don't necessarily aim for
the same impact or result when contributing.
The only thing the OCA should do on this topic is educate so contributors make the right choice reflecting their values in complete awareness of the pros and cons. A page or blog post on the oca website comparing the different licenses, with pros and cons,
with correct/incorrect legal/illegal behavior.
My 2 cents on the license. More to come on the contributions in the other thread later.
Cheers
--
Maxime Chambreuil
Desde mi móvil
From: Raphaël Valyi <notifications@odoo-community.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2025 6:36:58 AM
To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
Subject: Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2025 6:36:58 AM
To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
Subject: Re: Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Eventually we could create a simple OCA tutorial that would give an example use case where a company needs customizations that depend both on OCA AGPL and LGPL modules and need to protect some IP. We could give a few guidelines how to split
the codebase between AGPL and LGPL derivatives.
Obviously there would always be a grey area where people would carefully craft glue modules to action OCA AGPL code without explicitly depending on it.
But eventually we could still cover the most obvious cases. This could help to:
- limit the FUD about AGPL
- incentivate more actors to publish what should be published
Would it be risky for the OCA to publish such guidelines if a court finally interpret things differently? Should we officially cover the EE case as well?
Finally about AGPL enforcement in general: one thing is the AGPL be violated by some final users. Just like piracy in general, it's hard to avoid indeed.
But at least the AGPL should ideally protect us against massive violation by big SaaS players (because of the legal risks). Without such protection, a big actor (Odoo SA themselves?) would easily put all OCA modules authors out of business by
creating superior private derivatives without any attribution, much like some open source editors complained GAFAM like companies created unfriendly forks of their products.
Notice however that if the OCA starts selling double license exceptions, we will not even be sure we could name and shame or even sue some company who is obviously extending an OCA module without publishing it back. So I think it would just
incentivate piracy, not a net positive for me...
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025, 8:47 AM Frederik Kramer <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:
Hi Greame, there is amble debate on when an AGPL licenced software is actually made publicly available. To cases where it is pretty clear (to me and most people that i know do academic research on the matter): 1.) Your company is actually consisting of more then one legal entities collaborating on the same system (e.g. holding structure) 2.) If you use E-Commerce ar any means of direct user acces (like portal functions) 3.) If you let externals to your company access to the software (even with a VPN), e.g. freelancer use cases, suppliers, customers Furthermore as soon as you modify anything you implicitely agree to the license liabilities See https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1hh25a0/agpl_for_software_hosted_internally/ for a little bit of debate on the matter Best Frederik Am 13.09.25 um 13:02 schrieb Graeme Gellatly: > > The simplest way is to just not accept the license and not propagate > the AGPL licensed work. As long as you are using it unmodified, there > is no requirement to accept. Clause 9 is quite clear. > Conveyance/propagation as a combined work is easily avoided. -- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH Innungsstraße 7 21244 Buchholz i.d.N. Tel: +49 (0) 4181 13503 12 Fax: +49 (0) 4181 13503 10 Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Internet: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N. Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List:
https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe:
https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Maxime Chambreuil - 10:21 - 13 Sep 2025
Reference
-
Licence question: using AGPL and Odoo proprietary modules on the same server
Hi,After years of only working on Odoo community, we are starting to have several enterprise clients.The OCA website at https://odoo-community.org/resources/faq indicates:Can I run OCA AGPL modules and closed source modules on the same instance?
Yes, as long as closed source modules do not depend on AGPL ones and respect the license of its dependencies defined in the “depends” key of its manifest file (and vice versa).
Odoo SA, indicated in 2015 https://www.odoo.com/fr_FR/blog/actualites-dodoo-5/adapting-our-open-source-license-245Will we be able to use AGPL modules and paid ones?
Odoo projects will be able to use AGPL modules or paid modules under proprietary licenses, but it is not possible to combine both. Combining LGLPv3 modules and proprietary modules is fine however, so we encourage current owners licensing under AGPL to move to LGPLv3 too, in order to avoid complications for end users.My CEO believes that this using both AGPL and proprietary modules, even if they do not have dependencies, is not allowed by the AGPL license.I’ve searched a bit on the mailing list (that started in 2015) but I have not found no discussion on the subject.On what basis does the OCA position comes from?Regards,--
Vincent Hatakeyama Directeur du pôle développement " Orbeet
+33 1 83 62 72 88
vincent.hatakeyama@orbeet.io
27, boulevard Saint-Martin
75003 Paris
https://orbeet.io
by "Vincent Hatakeyama" <vincent.hatakeyama@orbeet.io> - 10:36 - 8 Sep 2025