Archives
Contributors
Re: Move purchase_request* and purchase_work_acceptance*
Re: Move purchase_request* and purchase_work_acceptance*
Re: Move purchase_request* and purchase_work_acceptance*
As I was in that case, why not creating a file with the same name for each moved module with a text content:
Module moved to repository xxxxx
--
Yann PAPOUIN, Ingénieur R&D | DEC
Yann PAPOUIN, Ingénieur R&D | DEC
Le mar. 21 déc. 2021 à 11:27, Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com> a écrit :
Now that having a lot of runboat instances is not too much of a problem, I think it's better to split the maximum repos for smaller sets of modules, so I will go to all of them that we are talking about. Reducing the number of them will:- Avoid potential conflicts between them.- Reduce tests size.On the contrary, it makes the ecosystem a bit more complicated, and gets people used to look to other places. When we unfolded OCA/hr into several repos, including OCA/hr-holidays and OCA/hr-expense, some people still created PRs to migrate one module that is already migrated, but on the other repo. But the problem here is that people don't look, and it happens constantly, not only with this, so no big deal.Regards._______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Yann Papouin - 01:31 - 21 Dec 2021
Reference
-
Move purchase_request* and purchase_work_acceptance*
Hi all,To reduce purchase-workflow repository size, I would suggest to create two new repositories in order to speed up tests.Thanks--
by Denis Roussel - 09:35 - 14 Dec 2021