Skip to Content

Contributors

Re: PSC responsabilities

Hi everyone,

I think the first step would be to create a system to automate or measure the contributions of PSC members. This would provide transparency and help ensure that everyone is contributing fairly. By tracking contributions, we can identify areas where PSCs or individual members may need more support or encouragement. This system could also serve as a foundation for rewarding contributors and giving them the visibility they deserve.

The goal should be to make contributors feel valued and motivated to keep up their involvement.

I think it's essential that we address this issue to ensure the strength and credibility of the community.

Kind regards,

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 9:28 AM Pedro M. Baeza <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:
I agree that some PSCs are not exercising their obligations and are just there for their rights when there are selfish interests. Others are just because they are now on other things and have become obsolete.

In summary, I agree that a PSC lifecycle should be implemented somehow.

Regards.

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



--
Binhex Logo
Jorge Elena Poblet
Founder & CEO
Binhex
j.elena@binhex.cloud
Office (Spain) : +34 622 40 08 08
Office (USA): +1 561 403 4406
Offices:
Miami | 8325 NE 2nd Ave, Miami, FL 33138, United States
Texas | 27027 Westheimer Pkwy Katy, TX 77494, United States
Tenerife | Street Subida al Mayorazgo, 13, Office 15-2
Las Palmas | Edificio Polivalente IV Campus de Tafira Parque Tecnológico de Gran Canaria
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook YouTube
Start for free: Try Odoo Community in the cloud

This email is confidential and intended only for the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
Privacy Policy


by Jorge Elena Poblet - 12:16 - 30 Dec 2025

Reference

  • PSC responsabilities
    Hi everyone,

    I was preparing this year Ranking of contributors and I am concerned on some information I found when crossing this data with PSCs.

    I found several PSCs that are not involved into their respective repositories. For example, I found a PSC team that has 5 members, 3 of them participated in 1% of the PR, on of them on the 15% and the last one on 98%. The repository was big (more than 400 PR on one year). In other examples, the PSC only participated in their team PRs.

    Even in my case, I think I need to improve my collaboration as a PSC.

    I think we need to improve this situation as a Community, otherwise, people will loose faith in the PSCs and how OCA works. Some ideas I can think about:

    - Control PSCs on big repositories (it is hard to set a proper KPI on small repos)
    - Demote PSCs that are not contributing properly according to this KPIs
    - Review this KPIs yearly
    - Split bigger PSCs in order to avoid too much work
    - Avoid people to be PSC of more than 3 big PSC Teams
    - Give PSCs some extra benefits (lower fees on OCA days, special t-shirts...)
    - Give PSCs recognition of their work (easy to say, hard to think about it)

    Maybe I am dramatic here, but I think it is important. WDYT? Shall we do something about it?

    Kind regards,

    --
    Enric Tobella Alomar
    CEO & Founder


    by Enric Tobella Alomar - 10:16 - 30 Dec 2025