Skip to Content

Contributors

Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA

Yeah, it could be interesting. I think the minimum for having it in OCA is:

- Having a decent CI for not lowering contribution quality.
- Extended README, explaining the reasoning for having it and advantages over existing IoTBox.

Regards.

by Pedro M. Baeza - 03:50 - 22 Dec 2020

Reference

  • Pywebdriver in the OCA
    Hello everyone,
    
    
    As some of you might know, at Akretion we use a replacement tool for
    the IoT box, which is called Pywebdriver.
    
    We are currently maintaining it with other OCA members like Acsone or
    GRAP.
    
    We thought this could be a good idea to have this tool under the OCA
    umbrella to ease the workflows around it.
    
    
    Since this differs from the usual repositories the OCA manages, I
    created an issue to discuss around this possible inclusion:
    https://github.com/akretion/pywebdriver/issues/57
    
    
    Looking forward to read from you about this !
    
    
    
    -- 
    Pierrick Brun
    Akretion
    
    

    by Pierrick Brun - 03:15 - 22 Dec 2020