- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
+1 I briefly discussed that with fkantelberg of our team and for now its seem arguments are for instance - no need for local postgres installation - windows support - flask usage - extensible architecture - .... But there is probaly much more. Best Frederik Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2020, 14:52 +0000 schrieb Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa): > Yeah, it could be interesting. I think the minimum for having it in > OCA is: > > - Having a decent CI for not lowering contribution quality. > - Extended README, explaining the reasoning for having it and > advantages over existing IoTBox. > > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org > Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe -- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH An der Eisenbahn 1 21224 Rosengarten Phone: +49 4105 56156-12 Fax: +49 4105 56156-10 Mobil: +49 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Web: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Rosengarten – Klecken Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
by Frederik Kramer - 03:56 - 22 Dec 2020
Reference
-
Pywebdriver in the OCA
Hello everyone, As some of you might know, at Akretion we use a replacement tool for the IoT box, which is called Pywebdriver. We are currently maintaining it with other OCA members like Acsone or GRAP. We thought this could be a good idea to have this tool under the OCA umbrella to ease the workflows around it. Since this differs from the usual repositories the OCA manages, I created an issue to discuss around this possible inclusion: https://github.com/akretion/pywebdriver/issues/57 Looking forward to read from you about this ! -- Pierrick Brun Akretion
by Pierrick Brun - 03:15 - 22 Dec 2020-
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
+1 I briefly discussed that with fkantelberg of our team and for now its seem arguments are for instance - no need for local postgres installation - windows support - flask usage - extensible architecture - .... But there is probaly much more. Best Frederik Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2020, 14:52 +0000 schrieb Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa): > Yeah, it could be interesting. I think the minimum for having it in > OCA is: > > - Having a decent CI for not lowering contribution quality. > - Extended README, explaining the reasoning for having it and > advantages over existing IoTBox. > > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org > Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe -- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH An der Eisenbahn 1 21224 Rosengarten Phone: +49 4105 56156-12 Fax: +49 4105 56156-10 Mobil: +49 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Web: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Rosengarten – Klecken Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
by Frederik Kramer - 03:56 - 22 Dec 2020 -
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
Yeah, it could be interesting. I think the minimum for having it in OCA is:- Having a decent CI for not lowering contribution quality.- Extended README, explaining the reasoning for having it and advantages over existing IoTBox.Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 03:50 - 22 Dec 2020 -
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
Great, thanks Pierrick!--
Virginie0477/64.17.20--Si vous avez un contrat de support, posez-nous vos question à l'adresse "support@coopiteasy.be"--Lors de l'envoi d'un mail, renseignez le nom de la structure pour laquelle vous travaillez. Merci.-------- Message initial --------De: "Roussel, Denis" <denis.roussel@acsone.eu>Répondre à: Odoo Community Association (OCA) Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>À: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>Objet: Re: Pywebdriver in the OCADate: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:32:01 -0000Great!Thanks for digging up that subject.IMHO, this could be an interesting value added for OCA.On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:16 PM Pierrick Brun <pierrick.brun@akretion.com> wrote:Hello everyone,
As some of you might know, at Akretion we use a replacement tool for
the IoT box, which is called Pywebdriver.
We are currently maintaining it with other OCA members like Acsone or
GRAP.
We thought this could be a good idea to have this tool under the OCA
umbrella to ease the workflows around it.
Since this differs from the usual repositories the OCA manages, I
created an issue to discuss around this possible inclusion:
https://github.com/akretion/pywebdriver/issues/57
Looking forward to read from you about this !
--
Pierrick Brun
Akretion
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Virginie Dewulf. - 03:36 - 22 Dec 2020 -
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
Great!Thanks for digging up that subject.IMHO, this could be an interesting value added for OCA.On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:16 PM Pierrick Brun <pierrick.brun@akretion.com> wrote:Hello everyone, As some of you might know, at Akretion we use a replacement tool for the IoT box, which is called Pywebdriver. We are currently maintaining it with other OCA members like Acsone or GRAP. We thought this could be a good idea to have this tool under the OCA umbrella to ease the workflows around it. Since this differs from the usual repositories the OCA manages, I created an issue to discuss around this possible inclusion: https://github.com/akretion/pywebdriver/issues/57 Looking forward to read from you about this ! -- Pierrick Brun Akretion
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
--__________________________________________
Denis Roussel
Software Engineer
Acsone SA, Succursale de Liège (Val Benoît)
Tel : +32 2 888 31 49
Fax : +32 2 888 31 59
Gsm : +32 472 22 00 57Acsone sa/nv
Boulevard de la Woluwe 56 Woluwedal | B-1200 Brussels | BelgiumQuai Banning, 6 (Val Benoît) | B-4000 Liège | Belgium
Zone Industrielle 22 | L-8287 Kehlen | Luxembourg
by Denis Roussel - 03:30 - 22 Dec 2020
-