Archives
Contributors
Re: Pywebdriver in the OCA
+1 I briefly discussed that with fkantelberg of our team and for now its seem arguments are for instance - no need for local postgres installation - windows support - flask usage - extensible architecture - .... But there is probaly much more. Best Frederik Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2020, 14:52 +0000 schrieb Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa): > Yeah, it could be interesting. I think the minimum for having it in > OCA is: > > - Having a decent CI for not lowering contribution quality. > - Extended README, explaining the reasoning for having it and > advantages over existing IoTBox. > > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org > Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe -- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH An der Eisenbahn 1 21224 Rosengarten Phone: +49 4105 56156-12 Fax: +49 4105 56156-10 Mobil: +49 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Web: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Rosengarten – Klecken Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155
by Frederik Kramer - 03:56 - 22 Dec 2020
Reference
-
Pywebdriver in the OCA
Hello everyone, As some of you might know, at Akretion we use a replacement tool for the IoT box, which is called Pywebdriver. We are currently maintaining it with other OCA members like Acsone or GRAP. We thought this could be a good idea to have this tool under the OCA umbrella to ease the workflows around it. Since this differs from the usual repositories the OCA manages, I created an issue to discuss around this possible inclusion: https://github.com/akretion/pywebdriver/issues/57 Looking forward to read from you about this ! -- Pierrick Brun Akretion
by Pierrick Brun - 03:15 - 22 Dec 2020