Skip to Content
  2. Mailing Lists
  3. Contributors
  4. Re: [SPAM] PSC responsabilities

Archives

Contributors

Re: PSC responsabilities

Re: [SPAM] PSC responsabilities

Re: [SPAM] PSC responsabilities

Hello Enric,

Can you share how this ranking is performed? What do you consider as participating?
Does having a github profile configured as private (like me) have any incidence on the information you collect?

kr
J-E

Le lun. 30 déc. 2024 à 10:17, Enric Tobella Alomar <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :
Hi everyone,

I was preparing this year Ranking of contributors and I am concerned on some information I found when crossing this data with PSCs.

I found several PSCs that are not involved into their respective repositories. For example, I found a PSC team that has 5 members, 3 of them participated in 1% of the PR, on of them on the 15% and the last one on 98%. The repository was big (more than 400 PR on one year). In other examples, the PSC only participated in their team PRs.

Even in my case, I think I need to improve my collaboration as a PSC.

I think we need to improve this situation as a Community, otherwise, people will loose faith in the PSCs and how OCA works. Some ideas I can think about:

- Control PSCs on big repositories (it is hard to set a proper KPI on small repos)
- Demote PSCs that are not contributing properly accor ding to this KPIs
- Review this KPIs yearly
- Split bigger PSCs in order to avoid too much work
- Avoid people to be PSC of more than 3 big PSC Teams
- Give PSCs some extra benefits (lower fees on OCA days, special t-shirts...)
- Give PSCs recognition of their work (easy to say, hard to think about it)

Maybe I am dramatic here, but I think it is important. WDYT? Shall we do something about it?

Kind regards,

--
Enric Tobella Alomar
CEO & Founder

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

by Jacques-Etienne Baudoux - 11:05 - 30 Dec 2025

Reference

  • PSC responsabilities
    Hi everyone,

    I was preparing this year Ranking of contributors and I am concerned on some information I found when crossing this data with PSCs.

    I found several PSCs that are not involved into their respective repositories. For example, I found a PSC team that has 5 members, 3 of them participated in 1% of the PR, on of them on the 15% and the last one on 98%. The repository was big (more than 400 PR on one year). In other examples, the PSC only participated in their team PRs.

    Even in my case, I think I need to improve my collaboration as a PSC.

    I think we need to improve this situation as a Community, otherwise, people will loose faith in the PSCs and how OCA works. Some ideas I can think about:

    - Control PSCs on big repositories (it is hard to set a proper KPI on small repos)
    - Demote PSCs that are not contributing properly according to this KPIs
    - Review this KPIs yearly
    - Split bigger PSCs in order to avoid too much work
    - Avoid people to be PSC of more than 3 big PSC Teams
    - Give PSCs some extra benefits (lower fees on OCA days, special t-shirts...)
    - Give PSCs recognition of their work (easy to say, hard to think about it)

    Maybe I am dramatic here, but I think it is important. WDYT? Shall we do something about it?

    Kind regards,

    --
    Enric Tobella Alomar
    CEO & Founder

    by Enric Tobella Alomar - 10:16 - 30 Dec 2025