- Mailing Lists
- Contributors
- Re: The OCA Functional Working Group asks for your help!
Archives
- By thread 1419
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 22
Contributors
Re: The OCA Functional Working Group asks for your help!
Re: The OCA Functional Working Group asks for your help!
Re: The OCA Functional Working Group asks for your help!
|
|
||||||||||
|
Nouveau
Choisir un nom de projet comme un pro |
Découvrir |
Hello,just a word to also encourage mkdocs if we aim at something additional to the current README markdown system. As Graeme said mkdocs is popular, capable and simple to manage (we really need to avoid big new tools that would be an infrastructure burden to manage). I think the README are slowly being improved, even if it's still by the module tech authors. In OCA/l10n-brazil we try to slowly improve these README for instance. At some point improving these README is lowering the entry barrier to the OCA and it somewhat makes sense that this entry barrier is lowered at the same time than the code is cleaned up and migrated so that non alien people will eventually succeed in their project with the OCA instead of just accumulating frustration by trying to attract at all cost people which will not make it with the current ecosystem (something that Odoo SA does quite a lot themselves in fact). So I mean it is not that bad if that documentation pace isn't as fast as some people who don't use to deliver real projects may dream...On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:27 AM Graeme Gellatly <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:I second mkdocs. All my non technical staff use it to build docs. Most.jist write markdown bit some use a specialised markdown editor although that seems to fail lintimg quite a bit.It is trivial to automate linting and deploy on merge.On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, 6:52 am Victor Champonnois, <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:Hello Julie,
>Do you know of any tool that could easily allow to edit and create PRs of README files in GitHub without the need of having GitHub knowledge? Something similar to what Weblate does for .po files ?
I think Weblate directly commits on the main branch, it does not create a PR.
As Andreas says, the edit functionality in Github seems like the simplest approach. However, it requires to create a fork of the repo, and to make a PR, so it's still a big barrier.
Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy Tel : +32 475 81 01 12On 24/04/24 07:44, Andreas Perhab wrote:
Hi Julie,
I think the edit button in github does most of the forking work for you and even helps with creating a PR when one is finished editing the readme (really any markdown file).
It puts images into /assets/{number}/{uuid} so that might need changing or we could just accept this additional directory.
regards Andreas
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 19:32, Julie LeBrun <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:
Do you know of any tool that could easily allow to edit and create PRs of README files in GitHub without the need of having GitHub knowledge? Something similar to what Weblate does for .po files ?
Hello everybody!
During the last OCA Days, the OCA Functional Working Group (FWG) presented the work made on the Documentation Project.
This project was created by the FWG to help and attract functional people to contribute to modules documentation.
2 main options were analyzed
Using the existing Read Me file in the code so we have only one module documentation which regroups technical and functional information.
Using the GitHub Wiki on the repositories which could be really easy to put in place and use.
The decision was made to use the existing Read Me but to convert it into Markdown so it could be easier to use and to add images.
Following this decision, an issue was opened in GitHub about the use of the Wiki instead of Read Me : https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/issues/606
BUT, we still have a big issue regarding this solution: the process to contribute to Read Me is really, really complicated for non-technicals.
You need to have a Github account and sign the OCA CLA
You would have to fork the repository (well, here we already have lost most of the non-technical people).
Then edit the files of the Read Me using the Web Editor (so you can add images).
Download your images in the right folder than insert them into the file by Drag & Drop
Create a commit and a PR.
Finally, the changes would need to be approved by contributors who have those access rights.
So, we were thinking: if we add a Markdown tool that can be used to edit Read Me files and automatically push the changes into GitHub a little bit like the Weblate tool, we could combine the PROS of both options analyzed.
Does anyone have any idea of this kind of tool?
Thank you in advance for your help.
The OCA Functional Working Group
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
--Raphaël ValyiFounder and consultant_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Julie LeBrun - 03:01 - 2 May 2024
Reference
-
The OCA Functional Working Group asks for your help!
Do you know of any tool that could easily allow to edit and create PRs of README files in GitHub without the need of having GitHub knowledge? Something similar to what Weblate does for .po files ?Hello everybody!
During the last OCA Days, the OCA Functional Working Group (FWG) presented the work made on the Documentation Project.
This project was created by the FWG to help and attract functional people to contribute to modules documentation.
2 main options were analyzed
Using the existing Read Me file in the code so we have only one module documentation which regroups technical and functional information.
Using the GitHub Wiki on the repositories which could be really easy to put in place and use.
The decision was made to use the existing Read Me but to convert it into Markdown so it could be easier to use and to add images.
Following this decision, an issue was opened in GitHub about the use of the Wiki instead of Read Me : https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/issues/606
BUT, we still have a big issue regarding this solution: the process to contribute to Read Me is really, really complicated for non-technicals.
You need to have a Github account and sign the OCA CLA
You would have to fork the repository (well, here we already have lost most of the non-technical people).
Then edit the files of the Read Me using the Web Editor (so you can add images).
Download your images in the right folder than insert them into the file by Drag & Drop
Create a commit and a PR.
Finally, the changes would need to be approved by contributors who have those access rights.
So, we were thinking: if we add a Markdown tool that can be used to edit Read Me files and automatically push the changes into GitHub a little bit like the Weblate tool, we could combine the PROS of both options analyzed.
Does anyone have any idea of this kind of tool?
Thank you in advance for your help.
The OCA Functional Working Group
by Julie LeBrun - 07:31 - 23 Apr 2024